Benchmarks Websites

'Benchmarks' Oriented Websites

Filesystems (ext3, reiser, xfs, jfs) comparison on Debian Etch

These results replicate previous observations from Piszcz (2006) about reduced disk capacity of Ext3, longer mount time of ReiserFS and longer FS creation of Ext3. Moreover, like this report, both reviews have observed that JFS is the lowest CPU-usage FS. Finally, this report appeared to be the first to show the high page faults activity of ReiserFS on most usual file operations. While recognizing the relative merits of each filesystem, only one filesystem can be install for each partition/disk. Based on all testing done for this benchmark essay, XFS appears to be the most appropriate filesystem to install on a file server for home or small-business needs (Additional Website Details)

Hardware | Linux | sysadmin | Benchmarks


Benchmarking Filesystems LG #102

(Additional Website Details)

Hardware | Benchmarks | Linux | sysadmin


Website Screenshots by Custom Shots

Bookmark Computer Software and Hardware at